2015-16 CVC Team Statistics

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	2b	3b	hr	xbh	k	avg	obp	slg	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.2875297855440826 1	Taft	36	1259	362	171	115	64	11	10	85	177	.288	.367	.380	53	18	25	36	434	294	1.48	1470
0.2814755412991179 2	Merced	36	1247	351	201	128	78	11	16	105	188	.281	.368	.400	54	19	32	31	343	329	1.04	1480
0.2809388335704125 3	Reedley	40	1406	395	212	195	51	9	12	72	235	.281	.381	.356	45	21	40	36	432	346	1.25	1707
0.2790513833992095 4	Sequoias	36	1265	353	167	134	49	7	4	60	153	.279	.364	.338	41	12	34	41	437	317	1.38	1486
0.27811094452773616 5	Fresno	38	1334	371	196	148	65	11	9	85	233	.278	.377	.364	75	18	32	38	385	350	1.10	1607
0.24464579901153213 6	West Hills Coalinga	36	1214	297	157	129	59	11	9	79	249	.245	.335	.334	44	15	18	28	347	305	1.14	1420
0.24384027187765506 7	Porterville	36	1177	287	119	109	60	11	2	73	245	.244	.326	.319	41	13	18	35	365	277	1.32	1358

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
252.0 1	Reedley	40	252	500	22	15
247.0 2	Merced	36	247	499	38	21
232.0 3	Fresno	38	232	485	48	23
203.0 4	Taft	36	203	478	41	22
188.0 5	Sequoias	36	188	428	22	16
181.0 6	West Hills Coalinga	36	181	405	31	18
136.0 7	Porterville	36	136	375	16	13

Rk	Team	era	w	l	app	gs	sv	ip	h	r	er	bb	k	k/9	hr	whip	bf	wp	hbp
3.174976481655692 1	Fresno	3.17	26	12	38	38	12	354.1	298	181	125	173	301	7.65	2	1.33	-	26	64
3.6618444846292943 2	Reedley	3.66	26	14	40	40	9	368.2	352	192	150	117	187	4.57	12	1.27	-	21	43
4.2719751809720785 3	Taft	4.27	14	22	36	36	5	322.1	369	209	153	122	199	5.56	11	-	-	39	46
4.363920750782064 4	Merced	4.36	20	16	36	36	2	319.2	281	198	155	166	244	6.87	10	1.40	-	36	60
5.200819672131148 5	Sequoias	5.20	13	23	36	36	6	325.1	383	231	188	123	186	5.15	13	1.56	-	35	47
5.560509554140127 6	Porterville	5.56	11	25	36	36	7	314.0	422	264	194	119	154	4.41	11	-	-	24	42
6.923076923076923 7	West Hills Coalinga	6.92	6	30	36	36	1	312.0	377	305	240	206	195	5.63	4	-	-	26	83

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.9607438016528925 1	Sequoias	36	1452	976	419	57	6	.961	35	27	18	.400	-
0.9606908874329958 2	Reedley	40	1679	1106	507	66	5	.961	40	30	15	.333	-
0.9554489376285127 3	Merced	36	1459	959	435	65	8	.955	39	25	20	.444	3
0.9519560741249142 4	Taft	36	1457	967	420	70	13	.952	23	30	12	.286	2
0.9510835913312693 5	Fresno	38	1615	1063	473	79	15	.951	37	60	17	.221	1
0.9468085106382979 6	Porterville	36	1410	936	399	75	10	.947	29	34	20	.370	1
0.945273631840796 7	West Hills Coalinga	36	1407	936	394	77	12	.945	36	57	18	.240	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
351.0 1	Fresno	18	6,313	351
119.0 2	Reedley	22	2,618	119
89.47368421052632 3	West Hills Coalinga	19	1,700	89
80.9375 4	Taft	16	1,295	81
19.571428571428573 5	Porterville	21	411	20
0.0 6	Merced	16	0	0
0.0 6	Sequoias	20	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	2b	3b	hr	xbh	k	avg	obp	slg	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.26570048309178745 1	Taft	24	828	220	90	70	36	6	6	48	121	.266	.340	.345	28	8	15	25	299	191	1.57	949
0.2838002436053593 2	Merced	24	821	233	152	86	57	10	11	78	99	.284	.371	.418	35	13	25	18	258	224	1.15	980
0.2917139614074915 3	Reedley	24	881	257	146	118	32	5	6	43	145	.292	.391	.360	36	15	26	21	264	218	1.21	1076
0.282172373081464 4	Sequoias	24	847	239	120	95	29	6	2	37	97	.282	.373	.338	33	8	23	29	274	230	1.19	1006
0.30292397660818715 5	Fresno	24	855	259	143	107	42	8	8	58	139	.303	.406	.399	50	12	20	23	238	226	1.05	1044
0.2478839177750907 6	West Hills Coalinga	24	827	205	106	92	43	8	7	58	166	.248	.340	.345	29	10	11	16	236	204	1.16	969
0.24436090225563908 7	Porterville	24	798	195	86	69	40	6	2	48	182	.244	.322	.317	26	7	9	23	238	175	1.36	909

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
167.0 1	Reedley	24	167	317	12	10
180.0 2	Merced	24	180	343	23	13
171.0 3	Fresno	24	171	341	31	17
104.0 4	Taft	24	104	286	18	17
132.0 5	Sequoias	24	132	286	16	12
127.0 6	West Hills Coalinga	24	127	285	15	11
98.0 7	Porterville	24	98	253	8	7

Rk	Team	era	w	l	app	gs	sv	ip	h	r	er	bb	k	k/9	hr	whip	bf	wp	hbp
2.668141592920354 1	Fresno	2.67	21	3	24	24	10	226.0	187	100	67	101	188	7.49	2	1.27	-	15	37
3.4392386530014645 2	Reedley	3.44	17	7	24	24	6	227.2	210	115	87	67	113	4.47	9	1.22	-	17	23
4.430981595092025 3	Taft	4.43	7	17	24	24	4	217.1	254	149	107	82	139	5.76	8	-	-	33	30
3.4386792452830193 4	Merced	3.44	16	8	24	24	1	212.0	169	102	81	103	168	7.13	4	1.28	-	25	36
4.308510638297872 5	Sequoias	4.31	11	13	24	24	5	219.1	241	132	105	73	120	4.92	6	1.43	-	22	32
6.274038461538462 6	Porterville	6.27	7	17	24	24	4	208.0	302	197	145	87	95	4.11	10	-	-	24	20
6.447115384615385 7	West Hills Coalinga	6.45	5	19	24	24	1	208.0	246	184	149	124	128	5.54	3	-	-	16	59

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.9610655737704918 1	Sequoias	24	976	658	280	38	4	.961	25	13	11	.458	-
0.9586538461538462 2	Reedley	24	1040	683	314	43	1	.959	25	10	8	.444	-
0.96875 3	Merced	24	960	636	294	30	5	.969	24	10	15	.600	2
0.9488229273285568 4	Taft	24	977	652	275	50	10	.949	14	21	6	.222	1
0.953125 5	Fresno	24	1024	678	298	48	7	.953	26	23	9	.281	1
0.9439655172413793 6	Porterville	24	928	618	258	52	7	.944	18	21	13	.382	-
0.9568965517241379 7	West Hills Coalinga	24	928	624	264	40	9	.957	23	25	15	.375	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
367.0 1	Fresno	12	4,403	367
117.0 2	Reedley	12	1,404	117
91.66666666666667 3	West Hills Coalinga	12	1,100	92
74.58333333333333 4	Taft	12	895	75
6.083333333333333 5	Porterville	12	73	6
0.0 6	Merced	12	0	0
0.0 6	Sequoias	12	0	0