2017 CVC Team Statistics

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	2b	3b	hr	xbh	k	avg	obp	slg	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.3388543823326432 1	Cerro Coso	39	1449	491	298	155	92	31	12	135	241	.339	.417	.470	50	16	15	28	353	340	1.04	1685
0.30830564784053155 2	Merced	42	1505	464	286	221	76	18	24	118	298	.308	.411	.431	54	20	31	32	367	381	.96	1831
0.3015647226173542 3	West Hills Coalinga	40	1406	424	240	171	83	9	8	100	263	.302	.392	.390	54	23	25	25	344	377	.91	1679
0.2790549169859515 4	Sequoias	45	1566	437	233	201	86	6	10	102	228	.279	.373	.361	46	21	33	35	432	465	.93	1867
0.2751677852348993 5	Reedley	44	1490	410	217	180	56	16	17	89	285	.275	.370	.368	57	21	26	35	396	389	1.02	1774
0.2682926829268293 6	Taft	40	1353	363	183	162	63	5	15	83	230	.268	.362	.356	43	11	27	27	421	324	1.30	1596
0.26038781163434904 7	Fresno	42	1444	376	230	222	65	12	18	95	288	.260	.377	.359	58	17	25	30	382	375	1.02	1766
0.19857029388403494 8	Porterville	40	1259	250	111	154	33	3	3	39	280	.199	.312	.237	58	11	20	23	393	284	1.38	1502

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
330.0 1	Cerro Coso	39	330	681	22	12
321.0 2	Merced	42	321	648	72	21
277.0 3	West Hills Coalinga	40	277	549	62	21
274.0 4	Sequoias	45	274	565	24	14
262.0 5	Fresno	42	262	519	34	16
256.0 6	Reedley	44	256	549	29	11
221.0 7	Taft	40	221	481	46	20
132.0 8	Porterville	40	132	298	22	12

Rk	Team	era	w	l	app	gs	sv	ip	h	r	er	bb	k	k/9	hr	whip	bf	wp	hbp
3.2569930069930075 1	Merced	3.26	26	16	42	42	7	381.1	305	188	138	166	357	8.43	8	1.24	1663	32	74
3.4320000000000004 2	Fresno	3.43	26	16	42	42	10	375.0	344	176	143	178	342	8.21	5	1.39	1647	30	44
4.024570024570024 3	Sequoias	4.02	30	15	45	45	16	407.0	444	227	182	160	331	7.32	11	1.48	1855	38	41
4.2297650130548305 4	Reedley	4.23	27	17	44	44	15	383.0	399	224	180	155	246	5.78	19	1.45	1740	51	36
5.467370441458733 5	Taft	5.47	19	20	40	40	11	347.1	404	261	211	177	231	5.99	16	1.67	1669	38	64
6.294797687861272 6	Porterville	6.29	5	34	40	40	2	346.0	481	364	242	164	195	5.07	17	1.86	1776	30	47
6.614354066985646 7	West Hills Coalinga	6.61	19	21	40	40	6	348.1	409	319	256	260	271	7.00	15	1.92	1770	45	78
7.001005025125627 8	Cerro Coso	7.00	17	21	39	39	6	331.2	434	310	258	190	276	7.49	13	1.88	1645	45	51

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.9714111922141119 1	Fresno	42	1644	1123	474	47	16	.971	40	59	15	.203	-
0.9611011370436864 2	Merced	42	1671	1144	462	65	6	.961	30	27	21	.438	-
0.9607731665719159 3	Sequoias	45	1759	1221	469	69	3	.961	24	33	11	.250	-
0.9544854881266491 4	Taft	40	1516	1042	405	69	9	.954	26	53	10	.159	-
0.9544827586206897 5	Cerro Coso	39	1450	994	390	66	15	.954	27	44	21	.323	1
0.9536266349583828 6	Reedley	44	1682	1149	455	78	7	.954	26	28	18	.391	-
0.9480354879594424 7	West Hills Coalinga	40	1578	1045	451	82	28	.948	38	57	15	.208	-
0.9252793296089385 8	Porterville	40	1432	977	348	107	41	.925	17	87	15	.147	2

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
317.0 1	Fresno	21	6,657	317
126.0 2	Reedley	20	2,514	126
97.0 3	Cerro Coso	20	1,940	97
65.0 4	Taft	21	1,365	65
36.0 5	Porterville	24	855	36
0.0 6	Merced	20	0	0
0.0 6	Sequoias	23	0	0
0.0 6	West Hills Coalinga	17	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	2b	3b	hr	xbh	k	avg	obp	slg	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.31362467866323906 1	Cerro Coso	21	778	244	141	91	49	15	5	69	145	.314	.402	.434	26	4	8	16	194	174	1.11	907
0.3290653008962868 2	Merced	21	781	257	166	113	37	14	16	67	152	.329	.426	.474	27	11	21	19	202	179	1.13	953
0.27823691460055094 3	West Hills Coalinga	21	726	202	91	61	38	4	2	44	151	.278	.350	.350	23	8	11	13	180	192	.94	829
0.28421052631578947 4	Sequoias	21	760	216	125	101	47	2	5	54	106	.284	.377	.371	20	13	15	14	202	236	.86	909
0.290633608815427 5	Reedley	21	726	211	97	77	26	11	4	41	144	.291	.370	.373	23	14	12	16	169	201	.84	852
0.2796143250688705 6	Taft	21	726	203	101	91	33	3	6	42	128	.280	.374	.358	22	5	15	17	230	153	1.50	859
0.2726063829787234 7	Fresno	21	752	205	137	123	39	6	10	55	142	.273	.391	.380	31	12	9	18	176	207	.85	927
0.17873651771956856 8	Porterville	21	649	116	39	72	14	2	-	16	159	.179	.291	.206	32	3	7	16	212	148	1.43	763

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
167.0 1	Cerro Coso	21	167	338	17	6
186.0 2	Merced	21	186	370	49	9
108.0 3	West Hills Coalinga	21	108	254	28	10
145.0 4	Sequoias	21	145	282	9	8
154.0 5	Fresno	21	154	286	15	8
111.0 6	Reedley	21	111	271	9	6
120.0 7	Taft	21	120	260	18	13
47.0 8	Porterville	21	47	134	8	5

Rk	Team	era	w	l	app	gs	sv	ip	h	r	er	bb	k	k/9	hr	whip	bf	wp	hbp
2.4050420168067226 1	Merced	2.41	17	4	21	21	6	198.1	151	80	53	86	192	8.71	4	1.19	852	18	32
3.6666666666666665 2	Fresno	3.67	13	8	21	21	3	189.0	190	93	77	83	162	7.71	3	1.44	843	15	24
3.646153846153846 3	Sequoias	3.65	14	7	21	21	5	195.0	209	102	79	76	155	7.15	4	1.46	885	17	20
3.6526508226691043 4	Reedley	3.65	12	9	21	21	6	182.1	175	93	74	71	123	6.07	2	1.35	808	20	17
5.841818181818182 5	Taft	5.84	10	11	21	21	6	183.1	212	142	119	96	118	5.79	10	1.68	880	21	33
7.692737430167599 6	Porterville	7.69	1	20	21	21	0	179.0	273	210	153	95	88	4.42	9	2.06	942	19	14
5.507220216606498 7	West Hills Coalinga	5.51	8	13	21	21	4	184.2	209	156	113	126	139	6.77	5	1.81	916	24	42
6.7871559633027525 8	Cerro Coso	6.79	9	12	21	21	5	181.2	237	162	137	100	155	7.68	11	1.86	896	25	22

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.972488038277512 1	Fresno	21	836	567	246	23	8	.972	20	20	5	.200	-
0.9556592765460911 2	Merced	21	857	595	224	38	5	.956	21	8	9	.529	-
0.9623971797884842 3	Sequoias	21	851	585	234	32	3	.962	10	11	5	.313	-
0.9586983729662077 4	Taft	21	799	550	216	33	6	.959	16	23	4	.148	-
0.9580686149936467 5	Cerro Coso	21	787	544	210	33	3	.958	15	16	8	.333	1
0.9560853199498118 6	Reedley	21	797	547	215	35	1	.956	17	4	7	.636	-
0.9424882629107981 7	West Hills Coalinga	21	852	554	249	49	12	.942	23	31	12	.279	-
0.9236641221374046 8	Porterville	21	786	527	199	60	15	.924	7	40	8	.167	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
345.0 1	Fresno	10	3,449	345
126.0 2	Reedley	10	1,255	126
60.0 3	Cerro Coso	11	650	60
54.0 4	Taft	10	540	54
7.0 5	Porterville	11	75	7
0.0 6	Merced	10	0	0
0.0 6	Sequoias	11	0	0
0.0 6	West Hills Coalinga	11	0	0