CVC Team Statistics

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	2b	3b	hr	xbh	k	avg	obp	slg	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.30934343434343436 1	Fresno	45	1584	490	292	218	101	13	24	138	295	.309	.414	.435	81	24	27	42	367	431	.85	1934
0.3015075376884422 2	Cerro Coso	40	1393	420	243	117	87	13	26	126	297	.302	.370	.439	46	20	17	29	317	344	.92	1593
0.2902391725921138 3	Taft	43	1547	449	266	200	77	11	45	133	378	.290	.390	.441	57	8	18	17	325	358	.91	1830
0.2755244755244755 4	Sequoias	42	1430	394	197	191	76	7	9	92	234	.276	.376	.357	51	20	35	42	421	380	1.11	1727
0.27501656726308815 5	Reedley	43	1509	415	257	194	55	14	10	79	245	.275	.377	.350	67	24	32	37	414	418	.99	1826
0.27227011494252873 6	Merced	40	1392	379	238	176	65	13	23	101	295	.272	.378	.387	72	17	36	24	340	369	.92	1693
0.21299921691464369 7	Porterville	40	1277	272	112	132	42	10	3	55	308	.213	.305	.269	39	3	29	24	384	303	1.27	1480
0.20406435224386113 8	West Hills Coalinga	36	1181	241	77	118	39	3	1	43	361	.204	.290	.245	26	2	2	20	308	240	1.28	1329

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
332.0 1	Fresno	45	332	689	55	16
313.0 2	Taft	43	313	683	66	26
301.0 3	Reedley	43	301	528	19	11
286.0 4	Merced	40	286	539	44	15
269.0 5	Cerro Coso	40	269	611	28	9
238.0 6	Sequoias	42	238	511	25	12
132.0 7	Porterville	40	132	343	42	18
86.0 8	West Hills Coalinga	36	86	289	21	13

Rk	Team	era	w	l	app	gs	sv	ip	h	r	er	bb	k	k/9	hr	whip	bf	wp	hbp
2.900826446280992 1	Fresno	2.90	30	15	45	45	11	403.1	355	199	130	208	420	9.37	12	1.40	1811	44	40
3.2797262617621894 2	Reedley	3.28	28	15	43	43	9	389.2	350	184	142	128	283	6.54	14	1.23	1671	32	39
3.362989323843416 3	Sequoias	3.36	24	18	42	42	4	374.2	358	182	140	107	332	7.98	17	1.24	1613	36	35
4.821428571428571 4	Merced	4.82	21	18	40	40	10	354.2	323	234	190	195	293	7.44	17	1.46	1638	45	94
4.887311446317657 5	Taft	4.89	23	20	43	43	10	375.2	399	263	204	193	303	7.26	21	1.58	1763	42	63
5.846456692913385 6	Cerro Coso	5.85	17	21	40	40	1	338.2	422	276	220	188	285	7.57	12	1.80	1643	30	46
8.26476377952756 7	Porterville	8.26	5	31	40	40	1	338.2	463	362	311	222	206	5.47	17	2.02	1754	41	70
11.164309031556039 8	West Hills Coalinga	11.16	1	35	36	36	0	306.1	484	445	380	221	214	6.29	14	2.30	1737	46	94

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.9641975308641976 1	Sequoias	42	1620	1124	438	58	2	.964	30	17	12	.414	-
0.9619109102646869 2	Merced	40	1549	1064	426	59	12	.962	28	26	30	.536	-
0.9593846153846154 3	Taft	43	1625	1127	432	66	16	.959	33	60	15	.200	1
0.9591129591129591 4	Porterville	40	1443	1016	368	59	62	.959	20	72	16	.182	-
0.9533923303834808 5	Fresno	45	1695	1210	406	79	28	.953	31	36	6	.143	1
0.9525083612040134 6	Cerro Coso	40	1495	1015	409	71	10	.953	30	28	13	.317	-
0.9509412435824302 7	Reedley	43	1753	1169	498	86	4	.951	36	31	18	.367	-
0.9151376146788991 8	West Hills Coalinga	36	1308	922	275	111	10	.915	20	63	10	.137	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
227.0 1	Fresno	24	5,434	227
133.0 2	Reedley	23	3,049	133
22.0 3	Taft	19	415	22
20.0 4	Cerro Coso	20	400	20
8.0 5	West Hills Coalinga	18	135	8
3.0 6	Porterville	22	50	3
0.0 7	Merced	17	0	0
0.0 7	Sequoias	23	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	2b	3b	hr	xbh	k	avg	obp	slg	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.3253012048192771 1	Fresno	21	747	243	158	103	50	9	11	70	116	.325	.425	.461	39	16	11	24	163	225	.72	916
0.26756756756756755 2	Cerro Coso	21	740	198	117	61	40	5	11	56	161	.268	.344	.380	29	8	12	15	160	211	.76	850
0.29545454545454547 3	Taft	21	748	221	126	89	28	5	23	56	164	.295	.386	.439	25	5	9	7	155	196	.79	876
0.2936400541271989 4	Sequoias	21	739	217	129	112	49	3	5	57	115	.294	.404	.388	33	11	20	19	212	195	1.09	915
0.2785515320334262 5	Reedley	21	718	200	133	103	27	7	6	40	118	.279	.386	.361	32	15	14	21	196	206	.95	882
0.2839335180055402 6	Merced	21	722	205	131	95	33	6	11	50	143	.284	.398	.392	48	10	18	14	165	210	.79	893
0.23453237410071942 7	Porterville	21	695	163	70	68	22	4	3	29	172	.235	.319	.291	20	3	17	14	191	167	1.14	803
0.20378457059679767 8	West Hills Coalinga	21	687	140	45	57	22	2	1	25	208	.204	.278	.246	14	-	1	15	179	146	1.23	759

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
175.0 1	Fresno	21	175	344	29	6
148.0 2	Taft	21	148	328	23	15
151.0 3	Reedley	21	151	259	12	5
151.0 3	Merced	21	151	283	16	9
131.0 5	Cerro Coso	21	131	281	7	4
150.0 6	Sequoias	21	150	287	13	4
81.0 7	Porterville	21	81	202	23	7
51.0 8	West Hills Coalinga	21	51	169	12	6

Rk	Team	era	w	l	app	gs	sv	ip	h	r	er	bb	k	k/9	hr	whip	bf	wp	hbp
2.557894736842105 1	Fresno	2.56	17	4	21	21	3	190.0	170	76	54	95	217	10.28	8	1.39	839	27	13
2.4200351493848857 2	Reedley	2.42	15	6	21	21	4	189.2	155	69	51	47	149	7.07	11	1.07	785	16	19
3.053003533568905 3	Sequoias	3.05	15	6	21	21	4	188.2	163	78	64	45	181	8.63	10	1.10	776	16	13
3.1508078994614004 4	Merced	3.15	11	9	21	21	3	185.2	148	85	65	78	151	7.32	7	1.22	805	22	41
4.735985533453888 5	Taft	4.74	12	9	21	21	7	184.1	189	121	97	89	148	7.23	9	1.51	848	24	28
5.663652802893309 6	Cerro Coso	5.66	7	13	21	21	1	184.1	231	143	116	91	147	7.18	6	1.75	882	13	25
8.767527675276753 7	Porterville	8.77	5	14	21	21	1	180.2	250	197	176	114	95	4.73	13	2.01	934	22	38
11.411320754716982 8	West Hills Coalinga	11.41	0	21	21	21	0	176.2	276	264	224	128	109	5.55	7	2.29	1016	29	63

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.9719512195121951 1	Sequoias	21	820	566	231	23	1	.972	16	2	5	.714	-
0.9682741116751269 2	Merced	21	788	557	206	25	4	.968	17	9	11	.550	-
0.9641025641025641 3	Taft	21	780	553	199	28	7	.964	17	19	8	.296	-
0.9608355091383812 4	Porterville	21	766	542	194	30	31	.961	11	29	12	.293	-
0.960559796437659 5	Fresno	21	786	570	185	31	6	.961	17	13	3	.188	-
0.9520295202952029 6	Cerro Coso	21	813	552	222	39	3	.952	19	12	5	.294	-
0.9521531100478469 7	Reedley	21	836	569	227	40	2	.952	18	11	8	.421	-
0.9098143236074271 8	West Hills Coalinga	21	754	533	153	68	4	.910	14	40	1	.024	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
270.0 1	Fresno	11	2,965	270
158.0 2	Reedley	11	1,733	158
18.0 3	Taft	11	190	18
21.0 4	Cerro Coso	10	210	21
0.0 5	West Hills Coalinga	10	0	0
5.0 6	Porterville	10	50	5
0.0 7	Merced	11	0	0
0.0 7	Sequoias	10	0	0