CVC Team Statistics

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	2b	3b	hr	xbh	k	avg	obp	slg	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.30808080808080807 1	Fresno	45	1584	488	320	212	105	22	42	169	379	.308	.409	.482	71	19	23	26	303	415	.73	1909
0.3076923076923077 2	Cerro Coso	40	1430	440	303	185	88	23	16	127	285	.308	.404	.435	55	14	9	20	326	337	.97	1693
0.29107021131561006 3	Taft	41	1467	427	329	258	87	21	47	155	404	.291	.413	.475	60	19	15	25	257	361	.71	1819
0.2892561983471074 4	Sequoias	40	1452	420	266	175	79	9	16	104	195	.289	.376	.389	38	18	15	32	391	407	.96	1698
0.28662420382165604 5	Merced	40	1413	405	240	171	67	19	16	102	268	.287	.386	.395	66	15	29	15	357	370	.96	1694
0.27137546468401486 6	Reedley	38	1345	365	224	180	73	10	18	101	295	.271	.370	.381	42	20	13	25	291	364	.80	1600
0.24981301421091998 7	West Hills Coalinga	39	1337	334	155	155	53	6	9	68	312	.250	.343	.319	39	9	8	36	336	317	1.06	1548
0.20840336134453782 8	Porterville	39	1190	248	83	101	40	-	2	42	346	.208	.289	.247	35	1	5	25	304	263	1.16	1332

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
364.0 1	Taft	41	364	697	56	19
355.0 2	Cerro Coso	40	355	622	42	17
354.0 3	Fresno	45	354	763	65	18
299.0 4	Sequoias	40	299	565	32	4
277.0 5	Merced	40	277	558	62	22
261.0 6	Reedley	38	261	512	18	3
174.0 7	West Hills Coalinga	39	174	426	28	18
91.0 8	Porterville	39	91	294	33	18

Rk	Team	era	w	l	app	gs	sv	ip	h	r	er	bb	k	k/9	hr	whip	bf	wp	hbp
3.1443037974683543 1	Fresno	3.14	33	12	45	45	9	395.0	346	196	138	180	463	10.55	10	1.33	1766	45	38
4.5680529300567105 2	Sequoias	4.57	23	16	40	40	8	352.2	400	226	179	124	252	6.43	20	1.49	1616	19	36
4.72317403065825 3	Taft	4.72	25	16	41	41	7	369.2	358	255	194	253	338	8.23	17	1.65	1754	64	48
4.760261194029852 4	Merced	4.76	22	15	40	40	11	357.1	315	235	189	212	328	8.26	18	1.47	1667	29	83
5.923469387755102 5	Reedley	5.92	15	23	38	38	3	326.2	407	279	215	180	261	7.19	28	1.80	1603	53	34
6.115727002967359 6	Cerro Coso	6.12	21	18	40	40	4	337.0	414	286	229	150	299	7.99	30	1.67	1617	40	56
9.48133198789102 7	West Hills Coalinga	9.48	4	35	39	39	1	330.1	509	468	348	261	219	5.97	21	2.33	1840	84	84
10.428571428571429 8	Porterville	10.43	0	35	39	39	0	315.0	531	504	365	215	199	5.69	19	2.37	1799	51	66

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.9611147116007777 1	Merced	40	1543	1072	411	60	28	.961	25	42	17	.288	-
0.9545171339563863 2	Taft	41	1605	1109	423	73	8	.955	27	45	14	.237	5
0.9525525525525526 3	Fresno	45	1665	1185	401	79	27	.953	22	39	16	.291	-
0.9509408602150538 4	Sequoias	40	1488	1058	357	73	1	.951	26	24	13	.351	1
0.9454042847270214 5	Cerro Coso	40	1447	1009	359	79	12	.945	29	38	21	.356	2
0.9317241379310345 6	Reedley	38	1450	980	371	99	19	.932	29	40	20	.333	-
0.9273097826086957 7	West Hills Coalinga	39	1472	991	374	107	43	.927	35	81	15	.156	-
0.9175627240143369 8	Porterville	39	1395	945	335	115	57	.918	15	83	14	.144	1

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
236.0 1	Fresno	25	5,897	236
86.0 2	Reedley	18	1,544	86
34.0 3	Porterville	23	771	34
30.0 4	Cerro Coso	20	600	30
27.0 5	Taft	21	565	27
0.0 6	Merced	18	0	0
0.0 6	Sequoias	23	0	0
0.0 6	West Hills Coalinga	20	0	0

Rk	Team	gp	ab	h	rbi	bb	2b	3b	hr	xbh	k	avg	obp	slg	hbp	sf	sh	hdp	go	fo	go/fo	pa
0.33806451612903227 1	Fresno	21	775	262	190	110	66	15	25	106	175	.338	.439	.559	38	12	8	13	132	201	.66	943
0.3112745098039216 2	Cerro Coso	21	816	254	188	101	47	18	11	76	168	.311	.405	.453	31	6	2	11	171	183	.93	956
0.3022049286640726 3	Taft	21	771	233	195	142	50	11	26	87	199	.302	.424	.497	30	13	8	14	135	187	.72	964
0.3229426433915212 4	Sequoias	21	802	259	188	107	50	9	9	68	87	.323	.412	.441	23	12	8	16	205	221	.93	952
0.3032258064516129 5	Merced	21	775	235	136	85	35	11	9	55	144	.303	.394	.412	37	9	14	9	188	196	.96	920
0.29419354838709677 6	Reedley	21	775	228	159	112	43	4	13	60	154	.294	.391	.410	21	16	6	13	158	214	.74	930
0.25312934631432543 7	West Hills Coalinga	21	719	182	92	87	34	3	7	44	177	.253	.349	.338	22	5	4	26	178	164	1.09	837
0.21176470588235294 8	Porterville	21	680	144	46	66	21	-	1	22	199	.212	.297	.247	17	1	3	17	188	134	1.40	767

Rk	Team	gp	r	tb	sb	cs
217.0 1	Taft	21	217	383	33	11
219.0 2	Cerro Coso	21	219	370	12	9
209.0 3	Fresno	21	209	433	27	11
217.0 4	Sequoias	21	217	354	23	2
158.0 5	Merced	21	158	319	22	12
186.0 6	Reedley	21	186	318	10	1
101.0 7	West Hills Coalinga	21	101	243	16	11
51.0 8	Porterville	21	51	168	11	8

Rk	Team	era	w	l	app	gs	sv	ip	h	r	er	bb	k	k/9	hr	whip	bf	wp	hbp
2.8216216216216217 1	Fresno	2.82	17	4	21	21	3	185.0	152	86	58	89	239	11.63	6	1.30	816	29	11
4.0864864864864865 2	Sequoias	4.09	16	5	21	21	4	185.0	206	103	84	53	147	7.15	9	1.40	832	10	19
4.695652173913043 3	Taft	4.70	16	5	21	21	4	191.2	191	128	100	112	169	7.94	7	1.58	894	40	27
5.190476190476191 4	Merced	5.19	12	9	21	21	7	189.0	182	143	109	107	181	8.62	13	1.53	889	15	32
5.3704379562043805 5	Reedley	5.37	12	9	21	21	2	182.2	207	141	109	95	166	8.18	13	1.65	875	31	20
8.159340659340659 6	Cerro Coso	8.16	8	13	21	21	0	182.0	260	200	165	91	155	7.66	22	1.93	926	22	34
10.399999999999999 7	West Hills Coalinga	10.40	3	18	21	21	1	180.0	294	268	208	146	123	6.15	16	2.44	1017	38	38
10.206703910614525 8	Porterville	10.21	0	21	21	21	0	179.0	305	289	203	117	123	6.18	15	2.36	1026	40	38

Rk	Team	gp	tc	po	a	e	pb	f%	dp	sba	rcs	rcs%	ci
0.9549878345498783 1	Merced	21	822	567	218	37	15	.955	16	19	9	.321	-
0.9523809523809523 2	Taft	21	840	575	225	40	5	.952	20	14	4	.222	4
0.9537648612945839 3	Fresno	21	757	555	167	35	13	.954	7	10	7	.412	-
0.9560723514211886 4	Sequoias	21	774	555	185	34	-	.956	16	5	6	.545	-
0.935361216730038 5	Cerro Coso	21	789	544	194	51	7	.935	15	25	10	.286	2
0.9341614906832298 6	Reedley	21	805	548	204	53	11	.934	16	22	10	.313	-
0.9169811320754717 7	West Hills Coalinga	21	795	540	189	66	20	.917	20	33	10	.233	-
0.9082914572864321 8	Porterville	21	796	537	186	73	21	.908	9	26	6	.188	-

Rk	Team	home games	attend	avg
260.0 1	Fresno	11	2,856	260
74.0 2	Reedley	10	732	74
63.0 3	Porterville	11	684	63
20.0 4	Cerro Coso	11	210	20
39.0 5	Taft	10	390	39
0.0 6	Merced	10	0	0
0.0 6	Sequoias	11	0	0
0.0 6	West Hills Coalinga	10	0	0