Central Valley Team Statistics

Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.31245791245791243 1
Fresno
Fresno
42 1485 464 248 167 79 14 10 103 217 .312 .391 .405 38 23 39 44 422 378 1.12 1752
0.289204097714736 2
Reedley
Reedley
36 1269 367 163 138 52 12 2 66 180 .289 .376 .354 47 16 32 34 356 355 1.00 1502
0.2843772498200144 3
Merced
Merced
41 1389 395 217 170 81 9 10 100 251 .284 .392 .377 84 14 39 40 392 345 1.14 1696
0.28085443037974683 4
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
36 1264 355 184 145 59 14 7 80 207 .281 .370 .366 39 9 25 29 383 303 1.26 1482
0.2700228832951945 5
Sequoias
Sequoias
38 1311 354 166 143 83 7 3 93 184 .270 .349 .351 24 16 20 35 403 347 1.16 1514
0.2619626926196269 6
Taft
Taft
36 1233 323 158 124 44 6 14 64 202 .262 .356 .341 65 17 49 24 363 364 1.00 1488
0.24756493506493507 7
Porterville
Porterville
36 1232 305 133 127 46 11 3 60 200 .248 .340 .310 52 11 17 33 411 296 1.39 1439
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
292.0 1
Fresno
Fresno
42 292 601 83 17
256.0 2
Merced
Merced
41 256 524 48 25
212.0 3
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
36 212 463 38 25
202.0 4
Reedley
Reedley
36 202 449 44 13
195.0 5
Sequoias
Sequoias
38 195 460 49 13
188.0 6
Taft
Taft
36 188 421 60 22
163.0 7
Porterville
Porterville
36 163 382 25 8
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
2.956204379562044 1
Merced
Merced
2.96 28 13 41 41 9 365.1 308 155 120 126 281 6.92 12 - - 26 41
2.9813000890471955 2
Fresno
Fresno
2.98 29 13 42 42 12 374.1 349 182 124 160 312 7.50 6 - - 31 45
3.5982490272373537 3
Sequoias
Sequoias
3.60 23 15 38 38 9 342.2 375 185 137 118 172 4.52 7 - - 26 50
4.299896587383661 4
Reedley
Reedley
4.30 20 16 36 36 8 322.1 334 190 154 137 190 5.31 5 - - 37 53
4.668351870576339 5
Taft
Taft
4.67 13 22 36 36 2 329.2 397 243 171 175 194 5.30 14 - - 44 43
5.332288401253918 6
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
5.33 12 22 36 36 4 319.0 392 237 189 136 190 5.36 4 - - 49 59
5.741052631578946 7
Porterville
Porterville
5.74 11 23 36 36 4 316.2 368 242 202 165 156 4.43 13 - - 20 56
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9634464751958225 1
Sequoias
Sequoias
38 1532 1028 448 56 7 .963 41 34 17 .333 -
0.961659333752357 2
Merced
Merced
41 1591 1096 434 61 13 .962 37 39 22 .361 1
0.9583622484385843 3
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
36 1441 957 424 60 22 .958 32 63 15 .192 3
0.9547038327526133 4
Porterville
Porterville
36 1435 950 420 65 10 .955 28 72 22 .234 1
0.9536912751677852 5
Taft
Taft
36 1490 989 432 69 13 .954 35 47 19 .288 -
0.9530434782608695 6
Fresno
Fresno
42 1725 1123 521 81 15 .953 43 45 22 .328 -
0.9513031550068587 7
Reedley
Reedley
36 1458 965 422 71 19 .951 24 43 22 .338 1
Rk Team home games attend avg
223.2 1
Fresno
Fresno
20 4,464 223
189.8095238095238 2
Reedley
Reedley
21 3,986 190
101.38888888888889 3
Taft
Taft
18 1,825 101
73.25 4
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
16 1,172 73
44.27777777777778 5
Porterville
Porterville
18 797 44
7.142857142857143 6
Sequoias
Sequoias
21 150 7
0.0 7
Merced
Merced
16 0 0
Rk Team gp ab h rbi bb 2b 3b hr xbh k avg obp slg hbp sf sh hdp go fo go/fo pa
0.3140495867768595 1
Fresno
Fresno
24 847 266 143 109 45 4 7 56 123 .314 .401 .401 24 16 24 25 217 237 .92 1020
0.28486293206197855 2
Reedley
Reedley
24 839 239 95 100 38 5 2 45 125 .285 .376 .349 29 10 23 24 251 226 1.11 1001
0.3001245330012453 3
Merced
Merced
24 803 241 135 110 48 6 8 62 124 .300 .417 .405 57 9 21 27 226 214 1.06 1000
0.2503052503052503 4
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
24 819 205 91 82 36 7 3 46 146 .250 .333 .322 22 4 20 21 259 209 1.24 947
0.28032979976442873 5
Sequoias
Sequoias
24 849 238 120 88 54 4 2 60 108 .280 .354 .360 16 13 15 23 272 214 1.27 981
0.2664188351920694 6
Taft
Taft
24 807 215 102 91 27 4 9 40 120 .266 .364 .343 40 12 28 18 231 258 .90 978
0.25 7
Porterville
Porterville
24 824 206 92 82 27 8 3 38 127 .250 .343 .313 38 6 12 25 284 196 1.45 962
Rk Team gp r tb sb cs
176.0 1
Fresno
Fresno
24 176 340 55 9
155.0 2
Merced
Merced
24 155 325 33 13
109.0 3
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
24 109 264 27 15
123.0 4
Reedley
Reedley
24 123 293 34 11
135.0 5
Sequoias
Sequoias
24 135 306 30 10
115.0 6
Taft
Taft
24 115 277 31 16
113.0 7
Porterville
Porterville
24 113 258 16 5
Rk Team era w l app gs sv ip h r er bb k k/9 hr whip bf wp hbp
2.470031545741325 1
Merced
Merced
2.47 16 8 24 24 4 211.1 158 79 58 68 157 6.69 7 - - 14 24
2.523364485981308 2
Fresno
Fresno
2.52 20 4 24 24 8 214.0 193 97 60 83 163 6.86 1 - - 13 22
4.150621118012422 3
Sequoias
Sequoias
4.15 14 10 24 24 4 214.2 244 121 99 79 104 4.36 5 - - 17 28
4.326656394453004 4
Reedley
Reedley
4.33 13 11 24 24 6 216.1 231 128 104 96 126 5.24 4 - - 29 40
5.007727975270479 5
Taft
Taft
5.01 8 16 24 24 2 215.2 280 177 120 132 100 4.17 9 - - 36 30
5.854914196567862 6
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
5.85 6 18 24 24 2 213.2 273 181 139 95 121 5.10 3 - - 35 45
5.1874015748031495 7
Porterville
Porterville
5.19 7 16 24 24 3 211.2 231 143 122 109 102 4.34 5 - - 16 37
Rk Team gp tc po a e pb f% dp sba rcs rcs% ci
0.9624608967674662 1
Sequoias
Sequoias
24 959 644 279 36 3 .962 26 28 10 .263 -
0.9611231101511879 2
Merced
Merced
24 926 634 256 36 8 .961 23 22 10 .313 1
0.9536757301107754 3
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
24 993 641 306 46 15 .954 26 52 11 .175 3
0.9609704641350211 4
Porterville
Porterville
24 948 635 276 37 1 .961 21 49 12 .197 -
0.9448979591836735 5
Taft
Taft
24 980 647 279 54 8 .945 26 29 12 .293 -
0.9532994923857868 6
Fresno
Fresno
24 985 642 297 46 9 .953 23 18 8 .308 -
0.9573604060913705 7
Reedley
Reedley
24 985 648 295 42 11 .957 18 28 16 .364 -
Rk Team home games attend avg
204.41666666666666 1
Fresno
Fresno
12 2,453 204
214.75 2
Reedley
Reedley
12 2,577 215
102.5 3
Taft
Taft
12 1,230 103
65.91666666666667 4
West Hills Coalinga
West Hills Coalinga
12 791 66
49.5 5
Porterville
Porterville
12 594 50
0.0 6
Sequoias
Sequoias
12 0 0
0.0 6
Merced
Merced
12 0 0